电影看完后，丝毫不觉得 3h 有多久，甚至有点意犹未尽的感觉。政治家施特劳斯的好手腕，最后时刻的层层揭秘、到微弱之势落选让人大呼精彩。

After watching the movie, I hardly felt the 3-hour duration, even feeling a bit unsatisfied when it ended. The political figure, Strauss, showcased his brilliant tactics, especially during the final revelations and his unexpected defeat, which was truly captivating.

但从电影里黑色视角来看，虽然确实有的点和角度看起来很小心眼，但是也不是完全不能理解。并且在此事件中身披负面恶魔的他，其实也真实做了许多慈善事业。所谓反派的人设也复杂地立住了。

From the dark perspective portrayed in the movie, some of his actions and viewpoints might seem a bit petty, but they’re not entirely incomprehensible. And while he’s painted as the villain in this event, in reality, he has done a lot of charitable work. The so-called antagonist’s character is intricately built.

结尾处在爱因斯坦的一句句回应中，交代了历史的押韵：奥本海默得到了他的小菜。他们俩恍惚间仿佛是苏武和卫青。

Towards the end, Einstein’s responses hinted at history’s rhyme: Oppenheimer got his just desserts. Their conversation by the lake felt reminiscent of the legendary Su Wu(stubborn patriot) and Wei Qing(have to commit to other countries) in the Han Dynasty.

In battle, in the forest, at the precipice in the mountains,

On the dark great sea, in the midst of javelins and arrows,

In sleep, in confusion, in the depths of shame,

The good deeds a man has done before defend him.

最后高潮完全被希尔博士震惊。当他说出，我、甚至其他科学家们都认为，委员会无权审问一个为原子弹作出突出贡献的人；绝对仅仅因为他直言不讳、坦诚自己一切想法就受尽折磨。我也情不自禁的激动起来。当他为他的失态说了句不好意思，我激动了。我想说，这才像个爷们。「记不全，但是差不多的意思」。

The climax was entirely shaken by Dr. Hill. When he stated that neither he nor other scientists believed that the committee had the right to interrogate someone who made significant contributions to the atomic bomb, solely because he spoke his mind and was honest about his thoughts, I was deeply moved. When he apologized for his outburst, I was stirred. I thought to myself, “That’s a real man.” (I might not remember the exact words, but that’s the gist.)

奥本海默有一个好夫人，患难与共。世上有人懂你，就不惧面对世俗一切质疑。而他面对妻子照顾不好孩子时也没有过多苛责，仿佛知道自己也同样有责任和义务照顾好孩子。只是，两个人”自私“地想为了心里更伟大的理想而奋斗。

Oppenheimer had a supportive wife, standing by him through thick and thin. When someone understands you in this world, you can face all societal criticisms fearlessly. And when his wife struggled with their child, he didn’t blame her excessively, seemingly understanding that he too had responsibilities towards their child. Both of them, in their “selfishness,” were driven by a greater ideal.

影片中的奥本海默，成功地还原出人物的复杂性，以及个人在历史事件中的渺小和不渺小。渺小是说，单看他一个人，挑不起什么大风浪。不渺小则是说，一群人做出了影响世界未来格局的事业。科学不得已地为政治服务。

The movie’s portrayal of Oppenheimer successfully captured the complexity of his character, highlighting both his insignificance and significance in historical events. On one hand, he seemed too small to cause any significant ripples. On the other, collectively, they accomplished something that changed the world’s future trajectory. Science, albeit reluctantly, served politics.

他无疑是懂科学家的，会为他们的家人考虑。以至于能想到为此 build a town 的 idea。能够团结个性鲜明的科学家们，为了国家的荣誉而进取钻研。还有对泰勒的惜才，想把他留下来的每周 1 h 聊天，都是奥本海默用行动证明的爱国。

He undoubtedly understood scientists, even considering their families. His idea to build a town for them was brilliant. He could unite scientists with distinct personalities, driving them to research for the nation’s honor. His efforts to retain Taylor, offering weekly 1-hour chats, showcased Oppenheimer’s patriotism through actions.

他也懂得科学家面对未知领域、探索前沿技术的自然的好奇心。尽管后知后觉这份好奇心的代价可能是毁灭全世界。near zero 的概率，在发生前的一刹那，是否心中也在祈求上帝的助力？

He also understood the innate curiosity of scientists when facing the unknown, exploring cutting-edge technologies. Realizing too late, this curiosity might come at the cost of destroying the world. With a near-zero probability, did he pray for divine intervention in that split second before the event?

而我在看到听证会环节时，非常着急。始终不能理解的是，为什么一个人的观点随着时间、事件的发生而改变是如此好笑，甚至要因此受到心理攻击呢。那律师冲他吼的时候，我不知道，奥本海默心里是在觉得老天爷在让他承受他应该承受的吗？

During the hearing segment, I was quite anxious. I couldn’t understand why a person’s views, changing over time and events, could be ridiculed or even lead to psychological attacks. When the lawyer yelled at him, I wondered if Oppenheimer felt that he was enduring what he deserved.

他的好老婆都知道，要 fighting。但他不。刻意为难自己似的。坚守着某种儒雅和不争。但又不是不争。想要证明自己的清白。想要坦荡荡的立于天地间。只是我隔着屏幕都被这种被迫的自证深深地揪心。

His loving wife knew they had to fight. But he didn’t. He seemed to deliberately make things hard for himself, holding onto a certain elegance and non-confrontation. Yet, he wasn’t entirely non-confrontational. He wanted to prove his innocence, to stand upright between heaven and earth. Watching him being forced to defend himself was heart-wrenching.

下午看完电影，晚上一直在维基百科里，浏览影片中熟悉人名的人生履历。惊讶于奥本海默所谓真正的平反居然过去了这么多年：

After watching the movie in the afternoon, I spent the evening on Wikipedia, browsing the life stories of familiar names from the film. I was surprised that Oppenheimer’s true vindication took so many years:

2022 年 12 月 16 日，美国能源部长詹妮弗·格兰霍姆撤销了 1954 年撤销的奥本海默安全许可。^[263]她的声明称，“1954年，原子能委员会通过一个有缺陷的程序，违反了委员会本身的规定，撤销了奥本海默博士的安全许可。随着时间的推移，越来越多的证据表明原子能委员会存在偏见和不公平。奥本海默博士所经历的过程，而他对国家的忠诚和热爱的证据只会得到进一步肯定。

漫漫人生，总有小人误解。同样的经历，不同人有不同的解读。

Life is long, and misunderstandings are bound to happen. The same experiences can be interpreted differently by different people.

重点是他们的解读吗？是他们的看法吗？不是，是从自己的内心里生长出来的自己想要依靠什么来谋生而已。想要选择什么样的生活，为此付出的代价与行动，甘之如饴。

Is the focus on their interpretations? Their views? No, it’s about what one wants to rely on for a living, growing from within. It’s about choosing a way of life and the actions and sacrifices made for it, which are willingly accepted.

若有人知己，幸甚至哉。

If one has a confidant, it’s truly a blessing.

【本文知识来源于 维基百科】